Hello Charlie
I was wondering if you would be kind enough to answer some questions that relate to the above frame grab.
1. Would you please be kind enough to name the '2 sexist, white, middle class, male able bodied councillors'?
1a. If you are not able to name the people in question, could you please explain why?
2. Could you please explain why it was necessary to mention their skin colour.
2a. Is skin colour important to you?
2b. How is it important?
3. Could you please explain the relevance of your comment about their physical condition and ability?
3a. To what extent do you judge people by their physical ability?
4. What criteria did you employ to judge the councillors to be a middle class background?
4a. Is class an important issue to you?
4b. How do perceptions of class affect the way that you deal with people?
5. Could you please be kind enough to name the 'traffickers' that were present? People trafficking is against the law and failure to name these people could prevent the police from dealing with them in the appropriate manner. May I remind you that wilful failure to disclose evidence of wrong doing is in itself an offence.
5a What specific evidence do you have that the above referred to people are or have been engaged in people trafficking?
5b. If you have no evidence that links the people in question with trafficking, why did you refer to them as traffickers?
5c. If you possess evidence of people trafficking, when do you plan to present your evidence to the police?
6. You mention that two lap dancers were present. I am given to understand that your group invoked a procedural clause that denied them opportunity to speak. Is my understanding correct?
6a. If my understanding is correct, why were the dancers not allowed to express their viewpoints?
7. Your comment about the dancers seems almost sarcastic. By what measure did you assess the dancers intelligence?
8. Can you guarantee that you or any member of your group will refrain from illegal activity in regard to your anti-lapdancing club campaign, both now and in the future?
Charlie Dacke: the voice of fashionable bigotry and identity politics in Portsmouth and Fareham.
ReplyDeleteYes that is true, but now the world knows about her. Today postings about Charlie Dacke have been viewed by readers from France, Germany, America, Russia and of course Britain. She is well on her way to becoming famous, just not for reasons that she will be entirely comfortable with.
ReplyDeleteHave u managed to contact Charlie directly to ask her these questions? I previously got into a debate with her about this status but she refused to reply and said I was trying to smear her and quickly changed her Facebook settings to private. Brilliant blog post.
ReplyDeleteI think I have a frame grab that relates to that issue. Will blog that later.
DeleteWell, she'd know quite a lot about smear tactics...
ReplyDeleteYou have to question the approach of scaremongering that is being taken. I would have thought some of the statements being made without any proof could be considered libel. I know she is relying on the fact that if she is taken to court she will claim it is the big powerful porn industry trying to shut her up. Personally if I was a venue I would get her in court simply because her lies are more hurtful than claims of victimisation.
ReplyDeleteThese people are not really feminist, they just have massive issues.
ReplyDeleteAs a stripper I have found the people who treat us with the most contempt and as 'objects' are in fact those who claim to be 'feminists'. When we try to speak they cut us down with a curt, 'oh you've been abused what would you know?!' or 'You've been brain washed.' They refuse to listen to the voices of the women in the industry and are the most abusive. Our mainly male audience behaves far more respectfully than these so called 'feminists'.
I only hope that licensing committees can also see that these people are insane.
"These people are not really feminist, they just have massive issues."
DeletePrecisely. And the only form of equality that they seem to understand is 'levelling', i.e. dragging everyone down to their own level of misery and self-loathing. Cultivating a sense of victimhood and collecting grievances (however petty) appear to be key to their particular subculture.
As I posted on another thread, perhaps our slogan ought to be, "Women: hands off other women's bodies"?
ReplyDeleteYou are correct, it would make a good slogan. I must admit that the current obsession that certain people have with what goes on inside clubs is somewhat unhealthy. My thoughts of the day largely consist of what to do next, what am I having for dinner, can I go out this week and other mundane things. For the prohibitionists, every day seems to be a night of sweat soaked nightmares about female nudity in clubs, followed by a day of rage about the very same thing.
DeleteOh and the odd spot of libel as well.
Not to mention an obsession with what other women decide to do with their pubic hair!
DeleteIndeed, but do not forget labiaplasty, breast enhancement and being attractive to begin with. It is becoming clear that this is a morality driven campaign, almost Talibanesque in its philosophy and outlook.
DeleteTry and have a look at the Facebook page PACT Portsmouth against the cuts. Scroll down and fine rachels post from march 2nd on this subject. I think you'll find the comments, especially those of Charlie's very interesting.
ReplyDeleteActually I found the site and have what I need. Thank you so very much for the information.
DeleteI tried and cannot seem to see anything there. The page is blank. Maybe I went to the wrong place and maybe someone saw your message a cleaned it out. Maybe you would be kind enough to check for me and frame grab the postings that are of interest and email them to me at
ReplyDeletechasmalspeaking@gmail.com
Thanks